No no. The results of the sectoral negotiations are specific new commitments and/or exemptions for the sector concerned. They are therefore not legally independent of other sectoral obligations and are not different agreements from the GATS. New obligations and exemptions from the MFN were included in existing lists and exception lists in separate GATS protocols. While the concept of progressive liberalisation is one of the fundamental principles of the GATS, Article XIX provides that liberalisation takes place in accordance with national political objectives and the level of development of members, both in the various sectors and in the various sectors. Developing countries will thus have flexibility to open fewer sectors, liberalize fewer types of transactions and gradually expand market access depending on their development situation. Other provisions ensure that developing countries have greater flexibility in implementing the policy of economic integration, maintaining constraints on the reasons for the balance of payments and determining access and use of their telecommunications networks and services. In addition, developing countries are entitled to technical assistance from the WTO secretariat. Services negotiations: WTO members continue discussions on continuing negotiations to gradually achieve a higher level of liberalization, as stipulated in Article XIX of the GATS. MEPs also negotiate national regulation in the services sector. Some activist groups believe that GATS risks undermining the ability and authority of governments to regulate commercial activities within their own borders, which will lead to the flight of power from the commercial interests of citizens.
In 2003, the GATSwatch network published a critical opinion, supported by more than 500 organizations in 60 countries.  At the same time, countries are not required to enter into international agreements such as the GATS. For countries that like to attract trade and investment, GATS adds a degree of transparency and legal predictability. Legal barriers to trade in services may have legitimate political reasons, but they can also be an effective instrument for large-scale corruption.  Work on GATS rules (Articles 10, 13 and 15) Negotiations on the development of possible disciplines not yet included in the GATS continue: provisions for emergency protection measures, public procurement and subsidies. So far, work has focused on safety measures. These are temporary restrictions on market access to deal with market disruptions and the negotiations aim to define procedures and disciplines for the governments that use them. Several deadlines were missed. The current objective is for the results to come into force at the same time as those of the ongoing services negotiations.